Sacramento, California Jan 26, 2026 (Issuewire.com) - Regulatory decisions and court filings outline a series of mandatory requirements for Sable Offshore Corp. ($SOC) as it seeks to resume operations at the Santa Ynez Unit (SYU) in Santa Barbara County. The project, which has been idled since a 2015 pipeline rupture, is subject to a complex jurisdictional framework involving local, state, and federal authorities.
According to Sables filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the company faces a March 1, 2026, deadline to achieve "Restart Production." Failure to meet this milestone could result in the SYU assets reverting to ExxonMobil Corporation without compensation to Sable.
Current Regulatory Status and Identified Barriers
A review of official actions and third-party analysis, including a January 2026 report by Hunterbrook Media (hntrbrk.com/sable-5/), identifies several distinct regulatory and legal conditions required for the project to proceed:
- California Coastal Commission Jurisdictional Requirements
The California Coastal Commission (CCC) maintains an active Cease and Desist Order (CDO) and a Restoration Order regarding the pipeline. On October 15, 2025, a Santa Barbara Superior Court judge upheld these orders, ruling in favor of the Commission. Consequently, Sable is required to obtain a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for both past unpermitted activities and future repair work on pipeline segments within the Coastal Zone.
- Santa Barbara County Permit Transfer Denial
On December 16, 2025, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors voted 3-1 to deny the transfer of essential operating permits from ExxonMobil to Sable. The Boards findings cited concerns regarding operator capability and financial assurances. Under current county regulations, these permits are necessary for the lawful operation of onshore facilities, including the processing plant at Las Flores Canyon.
- Pipeline Safety Jurisdiction and Ongoing Litigation
In December 2025, the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) asserted oversight authority, designating the line an interstate pipeline. This moved primary safety oversight from the California Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) to federal jurisdiction. However, on January 23, 2026, the California Attorney General filed a lawsuit against the federal government to challenge this transfer, seeking to return oversight to the OSFM, which has previously demanded more extensive safety audits and repairs.
- State Lands Commission Lease Obligations
Operation of the pipeline requires valid leases from the California State Lands Commission (SLC) for segments crossing state-owned seafloor and tidelands. In a May 2024 letter, the SLC clarified that Sables preliminary testing activities did not constitute a resumption of commercial production and emphasized that necessary regulatory approvals remain outstanding.
More On Intelliupdate ::
- Turkish-American Filmmaker Sean GK and Famed Director and Producer Savaş Sancak Running Oscar 2026
- ISTIF 2025 Hong Kong Conference Thematic Forum Explores Hong Kong's Development Strategy
- How to Choose the Top 10 Premium Stainless Steel Jewelry Manufacturers in China
- Empowering Change: Global Green USA - All-A-Glow’s Signature Bracelet Funds Climate Recovery
- Healing Starts with Listening: Luna Acupuncture’s Compassion-First Model Gains Momentum in Oregon’s Wellness Scene
- Gaviota State Park Easement
A portion of the pipeline route traverses Gaviota State Park. Legal counsel for the Environmental Defense Center has stated in court records that Sable must still obtain an easement from the California Department of Parks and Recreation, a process that typically requires an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and can take a year or more to finalize.
- U.S. Coast Guard and Federal Platform Certification
The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) and the U.S. Coast Guard maintain oversight of the three offshore platforms (Hondo, Harmony, and Heritage). Sable must maintain approved Oil Spill Response Plans and platform integrity certifications to operate in federal waters.
- Ongoing Environmental Injunctions
The project remains subject to a preliminary injunction resulting from litigation brought by groups including the Center for Biological Diversity and the Environmental Defense Center. On January 3, 2026, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request to stay Sables restart plans immediately, but the underlying lawsuit remains active, with the court ordering further briefs through early 2026.
Financial Condition
In its Q3 2025 10-Q filing, Sable disclosed a "going concern" warning, noting substantial doubt about its ability to continue due to a lack of revenue and significant upcoming debt maturities. The filing reported approximately $41.6 million in cash against nearly $900 million in debt. While a recent federal court decision declined to halt restart plans immediately, the company noted that its liquidity depends on obtaining the necessary regulatory authorizations for its pipeline plan or its alternative ship-to-shore (OS&T) strategy.
Source :hntrbrk.com
This article was originally published by IssueWire. Read the original article here.